Connect with us

BSM Writers

Hutson Mason Is Replacing A Georgia Legend Again

“Nobody wants to say, hey man, you need to do this better. But I don’t mind it. I don’t mind being coached and I want to make sure I’m getting better so I try to take that approach in philosophy to my media career.”

Tyler McComas




Hutson Mason is used to the pressure of replacing a high-profile name. At the University of Georgia, he replaced four-year starter Aaron Murray at quarterback, who left Athens with all sorts of accolades and records. It’s not an easy situation to be in, because it’s likely you’ll constantly be compared to your predecessor. 

Now, Mason in a similar situation, as he replaces John Kincade at 680 The Fan, who was let go due to Covid budget cuts, and has certainly earned the right to be called a radio legend in Atlanta.

Latest Radio News, Talk Shows, Sports, Hosts, Personalities |

“This is like replacing another quarterback,” said Mason. “I’m replacing a legend, a radio legend, in a sense, and you just try to be you. You can’t ever try to be somebody else or be the next John Kincade. I try to focus on being myself and letting my natural personality shine. That was my mindset while playing quarterback, you just let the results take care of itself.”

Mason will be with Buck Belue, another former Georgia quarterback who’s been a long-standing host at 680 The Fan and until recently had a show with Kincade for 20 years. The format of the new show will be a little bit different, as the duo will focus heavily on college football, the Braves and everything else local in Atlanta. But two former UGA quarterbacks on one show?

Granted the Bulldogs have the most loyal following in the state of Georgia, more than the Falcons, Braves and certainly the Hawks, but Georgia Tech still exists in Atlanta. How do two former Georgia quarterbacks convince a Tech fan to listen to their show every day?

“For us it’s just going back to what our show identity is, which is local,” Mason said. “We talked a lot about Georgia Tech last week. Now, there’s obviously a preconceived notion that there’s two Georgia quarterbacks, they’re not going to talk nicely about Georgia Tech. My response is, well, give the show a listen and I think you’ll be proved wrong.

“I don’t have anything against Georgia Tech. I think a lot of fans blow that stuff up that players hate a school. A lot of those guys, I played with growing up and I think there’s a mutual respect. Fans feed off that heat of a rivalry a little bit more and I think it carries over when you get to the media. For me, I just say whether it’s Georgia, Georgia Tech or anybody else, I just try to be as honest as possible. I get more crap from Georgia fans for being true and honest to their situation than anybody else.”

After pursuing a career in coaching, as well as short stints in both the CFL and NFL, Mason pursued sports media. Since then, his career has quickly taken off. Along with being granted a daily show at 680 The Fan, Mason now hosts Gameday with Hutson Mason every Saturday morning from 7:00-8:00 a.m. on SportsMap Radio Network. The hope and the goal, is that if networks and affiliates like the show, they’ll tack on another hour as the season goes along. Essentially the show is a preview and storyline show that features one guest a week. With his contacts and name recognition, Mason’s limits for getting big-name college football guests will be endless. 

But how did this happen so quickly? How did a guy, who really never thought about doing sports radio in college, quickly blossom into the star he’s becoming? Natural talent has a lot do with it, but more than anything, it’s probably the same reason as to why his football career extended past his SEC days at Georgia. 

“I like to be coached,” Mason said. “Yesterday, when I got done with my show (Saturday), I was immediately texting Craig Larson at Sports Map and I was texting people that have a one-hour show and sending them my audio, asking them what I was doing wrong. It’s very similar to how I was in my playing days. Peyton Manning had this whole quote of, I never want to be told by a quarterback coach or an offensive coordinator of what I’m doing right. Tell me what I’m doing wrong. When you ask somebody to give you feedback and critique, it’s awkward. Nobody wants to say, hey man, you need to do this better. But I don’t mind it. I don’t mind being coached and I want to make sure I’m getting better so I try to take that approach in philosophy to my media career.”

Five Georgia questions: Hutson Mason's, Todd Gurley's progress head list |  Chattanooga Times Free Press

Sticking two former Georgia quarterbacks on a show together in a college football centric city is a pretty good strategy, especially if your station strives to be the voice of college football in the South. But at the same time, if you want do do a sports radio show in Atlanta, you better be able to talk about the Braves. Admittedly, Mason didn’t watch a ton of baseball growing up, but he had to learn to talk Braves if he was going to be a host at 680 The Fan, which is also the flagship of the team. 

“That was a weak point of my radio arsenal, early on,” Mason said. “I didn’t watch a lot of baseball growing up and this is a heavy baseball town. The Braves are probably larger than the Falcons in this town. I think it’s just taking time for the past two years to just sit down and watch baseball, talk and ask questions about, hey, how do you view the game? What are you looking for? How do I find storylines as I’m sitting down watching? Football is easy. So is basektball. For instance, James Harden is a great offensive player but he can’t win a championship because he’s too ball dominant.

“For baseball it’s been a little bit harder for me, and it’s taking a little bit more time, but I feel way more comfortable after three years in radio of talking baseball. For me personally I don’t think baseball is an easy thing to talk about on radio. I don’t think it’s very entertaining, to some extent. It’s slow and there’s not usually a whole lot of juicy story lines in it from a national standpoint. But I don’t mind talking Braves right now at all because they’re so good and so young.”

One of the many benefits of bringing on a former athlete is the contacts that come along with them. Mason might be able to get an interview on the air a lost of hosts might be able to being a former SEC quarterback. So who would we choose, if he could pick anyone? 

“Someone I’ve already kind of reached out to, but I want to have on my network show on Saturday morning, is Paul Finebaum,” Mason said. “I’ve gone on his show a couple of times so I’ve reached out to his producer and said, hey man, whenever he’s got a slot open for media, let me know. I want to talk to the quarterbacks, but the communication teams for these athletic departments are such sticklers about getting open interviews. For head coaches, I’d love to have Kirby Smart but they’re just so strict on what access they get. But I really think Finebaum would be a great get for me.”

Maybe there’s something in the water in Athens, but UGA has recently turned out some of the best sports media talent that’s out there. David Pollack, Maria Taylor, Ernie Johnson, and now Mason, have put the school’s broadcasting school on the map. 

“My offensive coordinator really never let me do a whole lot of media, because he said I had throw up of the mouth (laughs). Now that I’m in the media I look back at that and laugh and think, wow, what a natural segue into a career.


“The mechanics that radio will teach you, if you can do radio, you can do anything. I’m so happy that I did it because I ended up enjoying it way more than I thought I would. But also those people I talk to were so right, when they said, if you can do radio, if you can entertain people for three hours, and the way it teaches you to think off the top of your head, it’s helped me so much in the booth now that I’m calling games with the SEC Network.”

BSM Writers

Is There Still a Place for Baseball Talk on National Sports Shows?

“Its struggle has been the same since the beginning of television. There is too much baseball for any regular season baseball game or story to have national significance.”

Demetri Ravanos




Last week at the BSM Summit, I hosted a panel focused on air checks. I wish I could say we covered the topic thoroughly, but we got derailed a lot, and you know what? That is okay. It felt like real air checks that I have been on both sides of in my career. 

Rob Parker of The Odd Couple on FOX Sports Radio was the talent. He heard thoughts on his show from his boss, Scott Shapiro, and from his former boss, legendary WFAN boss Mark Chernoff. 

Baseball was the topic that caused one of our derailments on the panel. If you know Rob, you know he is passionate about Major League Baseball. He cited download numbers that show The Odd Couple’s time-shifted audience responds to baseball talk. To him, that proves there is not just room for it on nationally syndicated shows, but that there is a sizable audience that wants it.

Chernoff disagrees. He says baseball is a regional sport. Sure, there are regions that love it and local sports talk stations will dedicate full hours to discussing their home team’s games and roster. National shows need to cast a wide net though, and baseball doesn’t do that.

Personally, I agree with Chernoff. I told Parker on stage that “I hear baseball talk and I am f***ing gone.” The reason for that, I think, is exactly what Chernoff said. I grew up in Alabama (no baseball team). I live in North Carolina (no baseball team). Where baseball is big, it is huge, but it isn’t big in most of the country. 

Now, I will add this. I used to LOVE baseball. It is the sport I played in high school. The Yankees’ logo was on the groom’s cake at my wedding. Then I had kids. Forget 162 games. Even five games didn’t fit into my lifestyle. Maybe somewhere deep down, I still have feelings for the sport, but they are buried by years of neglect and actively shunning the sport.

Its struggle has been the same since the beginning of television. There is too much baseball for any regular season baseball game or story to have national significance. 

Me, and millions of sports talk listeners like me, look at baseball like a toddler looks at broccoli. You probably aren’t lying when you tell us how much you love it, but damn it! WE WANT CHICKEN FINGERS!

A new Major League Baseball season starts Thursday and I thought this topic was worth exploring. I asked three nationally syndicated hosts to weigh in. When is baseball right for their show and how do they use those conversations? Here is what they had to say.

FREDDIE COLEMAN (Freddie & Fitzsimmons on ESPN Radio) – “MLB can still be talked nationally IF there’s that one player like Aaron Judge or Shohei Ohtani can attract the casual fan.  MLB has definitely become more local because of the absence of that SUPER player and/or villainous team.  I wonder if the pace of play will help bring in the younger fans that they need, but the sport NEEDS that defining star that is must-see TV.”

JONAS KNOX (2 Pros & a Cup of Joe on FOX Sports Radio) – “While football is king for me in sports radio, I look at baseball like most other sports. I’m not opposed to talking about it, as long as I have an angle or opinion that I am confident I can deliver in an entertaining manner. A couple of times of any given year, there are stories in baseball that are big picture topics that are obvious national discussions. 

“I think it’s my job to never close the door on any topic/discussion (except politics because I don’t know anything about it).

“But also, if I’m going to discuss a localized story in baseball or any other sport for that matter – I better have an entertaining/informed angle on it. Otherwise, I’ve let down the listener and that is unacceptable. If they give you their time, you better not waste it.”

MAGGIE GRAY (Maggie & Perloff on CBS Sports Radio) – “While I was on WFAN there was almost no amount of minutia that was too small when it came to the Mets and Yankees. On Maggie and Perloff, our baseball topics have to be more centered around issues that can be universal. For example, ’Is Shohei Ohtani the face of the sport? Is Ohtani pitching and hitting more impressive than two sport athletes like Bo Jackson and Deion Sanders? Do you consider Aaron Judge the single-season homerun king or Barry Bonds?’ Any baseball fan or sports fan can have an opinion about those topics, so we find they get great engagement from our audience.”

Continue Reading

BSM Writers

Who Can Sports Fans Trust Once Twitter Ditches Legacy Verified Blue Checks?

The potential for Twitter chaos after April 1 is looming.

Avatar photo




As of April 1, Twitter will finally make a dreaded change that many will view as an April Fools’ prank. Unfortunately, it won’t be a joke to any user who cares about legitimacy and truth.

Last week, Twitter officially announced that verified blue checkmarks will be removed from accounts that have not signed up for a Twitter Blue subscription. Previously, accounts whose identity had been verified were allowed to keep their blue checks when Twitter Blue was implemented.

But shortly after Elon Musk purchased Twitter and became the social media company’s CEO, he stated his intention to use verification as a revenue source. Users would have to pay $8 per month (or $84 annually) for a Twitter Blue subscription and blue checkmark verification. Paying for blue checks immediately set off red flags among users who learned to depend on verified accounts for accredited identities and trusted information.

The entire concept of verification and blue checks was simple and effective. Users and accounts bearing the blue checkmark were legitimate. These people and organizations were who they said they were.

As an example, ESPN’s Adam Schefter has faced criticism for how he framed domestic violence and sexual misconduct involving star NFL players, and deservedly so. But fans and media know Schefter’s tweets are really coming from him because his account is verified.

Furthermore, Twitter took the additional step of clarifying that accounts such as Schefter’s were verified before Twitter Blue was implemented. He didn’t pay eight dollars for that blue checkmark.


The need for verification is never more vital than when fake accounts are created to deceive users. Such accounts will put “Adam Schefter” as their Twitter name, even if their handle is something like “@TuaNeedsHelp.” Or worse, some fake accounts will create a handle with letters that look similar. So “@AdarnSchefter” with an “rn” in place of the “m,” fools some people, especially at a quick glance when people are trying to push news out as fast as possible.

Plenty of baseball fans have been duped over the years by fake accounts using a zero instead of an “o” or a capital “I” instead of a lowercase “l” to resemble Fox Sports and The Athletic reporter Ken Rosenthal. That trick didn’t get me. But when I covered Major League Baseball for Bleacher Report 10 years ago, I did fall for a fake Jim Salisbury account that reported the Philadelphia Phillies traded Hunter Pence to the San Francisco Giants. Capital “I,” not lowercase “l” in “Salisbury.” Pence was, in fact, traded to the Giants two days later, but that didn’t make my goof any less embarrassing. I should’ve looked for the blue checkmark!

But after April 1, that signifier won’t matter. Legacy blue checkmarks will be removed from accounts that haven’t paid for Twitter Blue. Some accounts that were previously verified might purchase a subscription to maintain that blue check. But those that were deemed legitimate prior to Musk taking over Twitter likely won’t. (There are also rumors that Twitter is considering a feature that would allow Twitter Blue subscribers to hide their blue check and avoid revealing that purchase.)

That could be even more true for media organizations, which are being told to pay $1000 per month for verification. Do you think ESPN, the New York Times, or the Washington Post will pay $12,000 for a blue check?

We’ve already seen the problems that paying for verification can cause. Shortly after Twitter Blue launched, accounts pretending to be legacy verified users could be created. A fake Adam Schefter account tweeted that the Las Vegas Raiders had fired head coach Josh McDaniels. Users who saw the “Adam Schefter” Twitter name went with the news without looking more closely at the “@AdamSchefterNOT” handle. But there was a blue checkmark next to the name this time!

The same thing occurred with a fake LeBron James account tweeting that the NBA superstar had requested a trade from the Los Angeles Lakers. There was a “@KINGJamez” handle, but a “LeBron James” Twitter name with a blue check next to it.

Whether it’s because fans and media have become more discerning or Twitter has done good work cracking down on such fake accounts, there haven’t been many outrageous examples of deliberate deception since last November. But the potential for Twitter chaos after April 1 is looming.

If that seems like an overstatement, it’s a very real possibility that there will be an erosion of trust among Twitter users. Media and fans may have to take a breath before quickly tweeting and retweeting news from accounts that may or may not be credible. False news and phony statements could spread quickly and go viral across social media.

Even worse, Musk has announced that only verified Twitter Blue accounts will be seen in your “For You” timeline as of April 15. (He can’t claim it’s an April Fools’ Day joke on that date.)

Obviously, that carries far more serious real-world implications beyond sports. Forget about a fake Shams Charania account tweeting that Luka Dončić wants to be traded to the Lakers. It’s not difficult to imagine a fake Joe Biden account declaring war on Russia and some people believing it’s true because of the blue checkmark.

We may be nearing the end of Twitter being a reliable news-gathering tool. If the accounts tweeting out news can’t be trusted, where’s the value? Reporters and newsmakers may end up going to other social media platforms to break stories and carry the viability of verification.

When Fox Sports’ website infamously pivoted to video in 2017, Ken Rosenthal posted his MLB reporting on Facebook prior to joining The Athletic. Hello, Instagram. Will someone take their following and reputation to a fledgling platform like Mastodon, Post, Spoutible, or BlueSky, even if it means a lesser outlet?

If and when that happens, Twitter could still be a community but not nearly as much fun. Not when it becomes a matter of trust that breaks up the party.

Continue Reading

BSM Writers

There’s a Lesson For Us All in Florida Atlantic’s Elite 8 Broadcast Struggle

“It is a ton of faith our industry has been forced to place in a single mode of delivery.”

Avatar photo




Ken LaVicka and Kevin Harlan probably don’t have a ton in common. Both of them were announcing an Elite Eight game over the weekend, that is one thing tying them together, but their experiences were wildly different. Harlan is on CBS with a production crew numbering in the dozens making certain all goes smoothly. LaVicka, the voice of the Florida Atlantic Owls, is a production crew himself, making certain those listening in South Florida heard the Owls punch their Final Four ticket. At least, that was LaVicka’s plan.

The Florida Atlantic Owls are going to the Men’s Final Four. Even while typing that sentence, it still seems odd to say. Do you know how many college basketball teams are thinking “how can Florida Atlantic make the Final Four and we can’t?” These are the types of stories that make the NCAA Tournament what it is. There is, literally, no barrier stopping any team from this tournament going on the run of their life and making it all the way.

Everyone listening in South Florida almost missed the moment it all became real for the Owls. With :18.6 to go in Florida Atlantic’s Elite Eight game against Kansas State, the Madison Square Garden Ethernet service to the front row of media seating went completely dark. 

It was on that row that Ken LaVicka was painting the picture back to South Florida. Well, he was until the internet died on him.

Nobody does a single show away from their home studio anymore without trying to avoid the nightmare of Ethernet failure. Gone are the days of phone lines and ISDN connections, all the audio and video is now sent back to the studio over the technological miracle that is the internet. It is a ton of faith our industry has been forced to place in a single mode of delivery.

Take that anxiety and multiply it by 1,000 when that Ethernet line is connected to a Comrex unit for the most important moment of your career. LaVicka had the great fortune of a Kansas State timeout to try something, anything, to save the day. In his quick thinking, he spun around and grabbed an ethernet cable from row two which, as it turns out, still had internet access flowing through it’s cables. That cable, though, was the equivalent of an iPhone charging cord; never as long as you need it to be.

One of LaVicka’s co-workers from ESPN West Palm held the Comrex unit close enough to the second row for the cable to make a connection and the day was saved. LaVicka was able to call the last :15 of the Florida Atlantic win and, presumably, get in all the necessary sponsorship mentions.

It was an exciting end to the FAU v. Kansas State game, a great defensive stop by the Owls to seal the victory. LaVicka told the NCAA’s Andy Katz he tried to channel his inner Jim Nantz to relay that excitement. The NCAA Tournament excitement started early this year. In the very first TV window 13 Seed Furman upset 4 Seed Virginia with a late three pointer by JP Pegues, who had been 0-for-15 from beyond the arc leading up to that shot. It is the type of play the NCAA Tournament is built upon.

It was called in the manner Kevin Harlan’s career was built upon. Harlan, alongside Stan Van Gundy and Dan Bonner, called the Virginia turnover leading to the made Furman basket with his trademark excitement before laying out for the crowd reaction. After a few seconds of crowd excitement he asked his analysts, and the world, “Did we just see what I think we saw? Wow!” Vintage Kevin Harlan.

One reason we are so aware of what Harlan said, and that he signaled his analysts to lay out for the crowd reaction, was a CBS Sports tweet with video of Harlan, Van Gundy and Bonner in a split screen over the play. It gave us a rare look at a pro in the middle of his craft. We got to see that Harlan reacts just like he sounds. The video has more than six million views and has been retweeted more than 6,000 times, a lot of people seem to like it.

Kevin Harlan is not in that group. Harlan appeared on Richard Deitsch’s Sports Media podcast after the video went public and said he was embarrassed by it. Harlan added he “begged” CBS not send the tweet out but to no avail. Harlan told Deitsch “I don’t know that I’m glad that they caught our expression, but I’m glad the game was on the air. I think I join a chorus of other announcers who do not like the camera.”

There’s a valuable announcer lesson from Harlan there; the audience is almost always there for the game, not you. Harlan went on to describe the broadcast booth to Deitsch as somewhat of a sacred place. He would prefer to let his words accompany the video of the action to tell the story. Kevin Harlan is as good as they come at his craft, if he thinks that way, there’s probably great value in that line of thought.

We can learn from LaVicka, as well. You work in this business long enough and you come to accept technical difficulties are as much a part of it as anything. They always seem to strike at the worst times, it is just in their nature. Those who can find a way to deal with them without everything melting down are those who can give their audience what they showed up for. Those who lose their mind and spend time complaining about them during the production simply give the audience information they don’t really care about.

The Final Four is an unlikely collection of teams; Miami, San Diego State, Connecticut and Florida Atlantic. You all had that in your brackets, right? Yep, the Florida Atlantic Owls are going to the Final Four and Ken LaVicka will be there for it. Now, if the internet will just hold out.

Continue Reading


Barrett Media Writers

Copyright © 2023 Barrett Media.